Journal
TOURISM RECREATION RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 157-168Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02508281.2015.1039331
Keywords
emerging regions; Eurocentrism; paradigm shift; mobilities
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper addresses critiques of Eurocentrism in tourism studies, which have called for a 'paradigm shift' in response to the rapid rise of tourism from emerging world regions. We clarify the concept of a paradigm shift, and examine arguments for a shift in tourism studies on epistemological, theoretical and empirical levels. We argue for a shift on the theoretical level: the incorporation of tourism studies in the mobilities paradigm. We argue that this paradigm offers a fresh perspective on tourism as enmeshed with other kinds of discretionary mobilities, is free of Eurocentric assumptions, and destabilizes some of the leading concepts on which now problematic binary modernist thinking in tourism studies is based. However, the positivistic, 'etic' character of early studies of the mobilities paradigm hinders its culturally nuanced deployment in emerging world regions, a limitation we seek to remedy by adapting Tim Cresswell's conceptualization of mobility that comprised movement, representation and practice. We conclude by providing a summary of the principal findings of our application of the mobilities paradigm to the comparative study of tourism from the emerging regions.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available