4.8 Article

Quantitative Comparison of Linear Flux-Switching Permanent Magnet Motor With Linear Induction Motor for Electromagnetic Launch System

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 65, Issue 9, Pages 7569-7578

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2798592

Keywords

Electromagnetic launch system; finite element analysis; linear flux-switching permanent magnet (LFSPM) motor; linear induction motor; long primary

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51407093]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiang Su province [BK20140814]
  3. Funds of Graduate Innovation Center in NUAA [KFJJ20170310]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [56XCA16050, NS2017014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To incorporate the merits of simple and robust movers of induction linear motors and higher power factor and high efficiency of permanent magnet linear motors, a new long primary double-sided linear flux-switching permanent magnet (DSLFSPM) motor is proposed, investigated, and quantitatively compared with linear induction motors (LIM) for the electromagnetic launch system. First, the topology, operation principle, and electromagnetic performance of the DSLFSPM motor have been investigated. Then, in order to analyze the LIMs comprehensively, three LIMs have been designed based on the same overall dimensions and other key parameters. Finally, the electromagnetic performance of DSLFSPM motor and LIMs have been compared and summarized. The results show that the DSLFSPM motor has some merits such as higher efficiency, higher power factor, more robust mover, larger thrust force, and smaller force ripple than LIM motors. In order to validate the simulation results, a small-scale prototype of DSLFSPM motor has been built and measured.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available