4.4 Article

The periglacial engine of mountain erosion - Part 2: Modelling large-scale landscape evolution

Journal

EARTH SURFACE DYNAMICS
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 463-482

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/esurf-3-463-2015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Danish Council for Independent Research
  2. Aarhus University Research Foundation
  3. Australian Research Council [DP130104023]
  4. Marie Curie fellowship (FP7) via the Brandenburg Research Academy
  5. Villum Fonden [00007263] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is growing recognition of strong periglacial control on bedrock erosion in mountain landscapes, including the shaping of low-relief surfaces at high elevations (summit flats). But, as yet, the hypothesis that frost action was crucial to the assumed Late Cenozoic rise in erosion rates remains compelling and untested. Here we present a landscape evolution model incorporating two key periglacial processes - regolith production via frost cracking and sediment transport via frost creep - which together are harnessed to variations in temperature and the evolving thickness of sediment cover. Our computational experiments time-integrate the contribution of frost action to shaping mountain topography over million-year timescales, with the primary and highly reproducible outcome being the development of flattish or gently convex summit flats. A simple scaling of temperature to marine delta O-18 records spanning the past 14 Myr indicates that the highest summit flats in mid-to high-latitude mountains may have formed via frost action prior to the Quaternary. We suggest that deep cooling in the Quaternary accelerated mechanical weathering globally by significantly expanding the area subject to frost. Further, the inclusion of subglacial erosion alongside periglacial processes in our computational experiments points to alpine glaciers increasing the long-term efficiency of frost-driven erosion by steepening hillslopes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available