4.8 Article

Robust Fault-Tolerant Predictive Current Control for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors Considering Demagnetization Fault

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 65, Issue 7, Pages 5324-5334

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2017.2774758

Keywords

Observer; permanent magnet demagnetization; permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM); parameter perturbation; predictive current control (PCC)

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61773159, 61473117, 61733004]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFF0203400]
  3. Key Laboratory for Electric Drive Control and Intelligent Equipment of Hunan Province [2016TP1018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a robust fault-tolerant predictive current control (RFT-PCC) algorithm based on a composite observer is proposed for permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs), which can eliminate the influence of motor parameter perturbation and permanent magnet demagnetization. First, the effects of the parameter perturbation and permanent magnet demagnetization on the current vector are analyzed based on the conventional predictive current control. The composite observer based on the sliding mode observer and the Luenberger observer is then designed to observe the compensation voltage and current prediction value of the next time simultaneously. Finally, an RFT-PCC method is developed. The proposed RFT-PCC is able to effectively enhance robustness against parameter perturbation and permanent magnet demagnetization by adding compensation voltage. The current prediction value of the next time is used to replace the sampled current in RFT-PCC to compensate for the influence of the one-step delay. Comparative simulations and experimentations verify that the proposed RFT-PCC can improve the robustness while maintaining quick dynamic response of the current control loops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available