4.8 Article

An Efficient Multiobjective Design Optimization Method for a PMSLM Based on an Extreme Learning Machine

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages 1001-1011

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2835413

Keywords

Extreme learning machine (ELM); finite-element analysis (FEA); gray wolf optimizer algorithm (GWOA); multiobjective design optimization; permanent magnet synchronous linear motors (PMSLMs); support vector machine (SVM)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51637001, 51577001, 51607002, 51277002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on the multiobjective design optimization of the permanent magnet synchronous linear motors (PMSLMs), which are applied to a high-precision laser engraving machine. A novel efficient multiobjective design optimization method for a PMSLM is proposed to achieve optimal performances as indicated by high average thrust, low thrust ripple, and low total harmonic distortion at different running speeds. First, based on the finite-element analysis (FEA) data, a regression machine learning algorithm, called an extreme learning machine (ELM), is introduced to solve the calculation modeling problem by mapping out the nonlinear and complex relationship between input structural factors and output motor performances. Comparative simulation experiments conducted using the traditional analytical modeling method and another machine learning modeling method, i.e., support vector machine, confirm the superiority of the ELM. Then, a new bionic intelligent optimization algorithm, called the gray wolf optimizer algorithm, is used to search the best optimization performances and structural parameters by performing iteration optimization calculation for multiobjective functions. Finally, FEA and prototype motor experiments prove the effectiveness and validity of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available