4.7 Article

Exploiting Color Volume and Color Difference for Salient Region Detection

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 6-16

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2018.2847422

Keywords

Visual attention; L* a* b* color space; regional color volume; perceptually uniform color difference; saliency detection

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61463008, 61866005]
  2. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation of China [2018GXNSFAA138017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Foreground and background cues can assist humans in quickly understanding visual scenes. In computer vision, however, it is difficult to detect salient objects when they touch the image boundary. Hence, detecting salient objects robustly under such circumstances without sacrificing precision and recall can be challenging. In this paper, we propose a novel model for salient region detection, namely, the foreground-center background (FCB) saliency model. Its main highlights as follows. First, we use regional color volume as the foreground, together with perceptually uniform color differences within regions to detect salient regions. This can highlight salient objects robustly, even when they touched the image boundary, without greatly sacrificing precision and recall. Second, we employ center saliency to detect salient regions together with foreground and background cues, which improves saliency detection performance. Finally, we propose a novel and simple yet efficient method that combines foreground, center, and background saliency. Experimental validation with three well-known benchmark data sets indicates that the FCB model outperforms several stateof-the-art methods in terms of precision, recall, F-measure, and particularly, the mean absolute error. Salient regions are brighter than those of some existing state-of-the-art methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available