4.7 Article

A Posteriori Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection for Unlabeled Classification

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages 3091-3106

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2790583

Keywords

A posteriori anomaly detection (AD); anomaly discrimination; automatic target generation process (ATGP); constrained energy minimization (CEM); iterative AD (IAD); K-AD; Otsu's method; R-AD; unlabeled anomaly classification (UAC)

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universitie [3132017080]
  2. Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Spectral Imaging Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences [LSIT201707D]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [JB150508]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61601077]
  5. National Nature Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [20170540095]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anomaly detection (AD) generally finds targets that are spectrally distinct from their surrounding neighborhoods but cannot discriminate its detected targets one from another. It cannot even perform classification because there is no prior knowledge about the data. This paper presents a new approach to AD, to be called a posteriori AD for unlabeled anomaly classification where a posteriori indicates that information obtained directly from processing data is used as new information for subsequent data processing. In particular, a posteriori AD uses a Gaussian filter to capture spatial correlation of detected anomalies as a posteriori information which is included as new information for further AD. In doing so, a posteriori AD develops an iterative version of AD, referred to as iterative anomaly detection (IAD), which implements AD by feeding back Gaussian-filtered AD maps in an iterative manner. It then uses an unsupervised target detection algorithm to identify spectrally distinct anomalies that can be used to specify particular anomaly classes. To terminate IAD, an automatic stopping rule is also derived. Finally, it uses identified distinct anomalies as desired target signatures to implement constrained energy minimization (CEM) to classify all detected anomalies into unlabeled classes. The experimental results show that a posteriori AD is indeed very effective in unlabeled anomaly classification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available