4.7 Article

Performance Analysis of Airborne Photon-Counting Lidar Data in Preparation for the ICESat-2 Mission

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages 2911-2918

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2786659

Keywords

Altimetry; Ice; Cloud and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) calibration; laser radar; Multiple Altimeter Beam Experimental Lidar (MABEL); photon-counting lidar

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Cryosphere Program for the ICESat-2 Science Definition Team [NNX15A68G]
  2. NASA ICESat-2 Project Science Office

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two airborne photon-counting laser altimeters have been deployed in direct support of National Aeronautics and Space Adminsitration (NASA's) upcoming Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) mission. Multiple Altimeter Beam Experimental Lidar (MABEL) was developed specifically for ICESat-2 testing and development. MABEL data are used to simulate key aspects of the ICESat-2 measurement strategy and are critical to the development of the algorithms for geophysical data-product generation. Slope Imaging Multi-polarization Photon-counting Lidar (SIMPL) is a NASA Goddard Space Flight Center instrument that has also been deployed in support of ICESat-2 performance discovery. Both instruments are photon-counting, small footprint laser altimeters that sample in both the 532- and 1064-nm wavelengths. And both instruments serve as a proxy for ICESat-2 operational performance and error assessment and a basis for the development of potential validation strategies. This paper provides an overview of how data from MABEL and SIMPL overflights have specifically provided the foundation for understanding the quality of ICESat-2 data and how we can plan to evaluate ICESat-2 products through comparison with other modalities of lidar data and/or ground-truth locations using ground fiducials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available