4.7 Article

Two-Stream Deep Architecture for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages 2349-2361

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2778343

Keywords

Class-specific fusion; convolutional neural networks (CNNs); deep learning; hyperspectral image (HSI) classification; remote sensing; stacked denoising autoencoder (SdAE); two-stream architecture

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61572269, 61701272]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2682016CX083]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2017PF004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most traditional approaches classify hyperspectral image (HSI) pixels relying only on the spectral values of the input channels. However, the spatial context around a pixel is also very important and can enhance the classification performance. In order to effectively exploit and fuse both the spatial context and spectral structure, we propose a novel two-stream deep architecture for HSI classification. The proposed method consists of a two-stream architecture and a novel fusion scheme. In the two-stream architecture, one stream employs the stacked denoising autoencoder to encode the spectral values of each input pixel, and the other stream takes as input the corresponding image patch and deep convolutional neural networks are employed to process the image patch. In the fusion scheme, the prediction probabilities from two streams are fused by adaptive class-specific weights, which can be obtained by a fully connected layer. Finally, a weight regularizer is added to the loss function to alleviate the overfitting of the class-specific fusion weights. Experimental results on real HSIs demonstrate that the proposed two-stream deep architecture can achieve competitive performance compared with the state-of-the-art methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available