4.7 Article

A Learning Automata-Based Multiobjective Hyper-Heuristic

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 59-73

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEVC.2017.2785346

Keywords

Evolutionary algorithms; hyper-heuristics; multiobjective optimization; online learning; operational research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metaheuristics, being tailored to each particular domain by experts, have been successfully applied to many computationally hard optimization problems. However, once implemented, their application to a new problem domain or a slight change in the problem description would often require additional expert intervention. There is a growing number of studies on reusable cross-domain search methodologies, such as selection hyper-heuristics, which are applicable to problem instances from various domains, requiring minimal expert intervention or even none. This paper introduces a new learning automata-based selection hyper-heuristic controlling a set of multiobjective metaheuristics. The approach operates above three well-known multiobjective evolutionary algorithms and mixes them, exploiting the strengths of each algorithm. The performance and behavior of two variants of the proposed selection hyper-heuristic, each utilizing a different initialization scheme are investigated across a range of unconstrained multiobjective mathematical benchmark functions from two different sets and the real-world problem of vehicle crash-worthiness. The empirical results illustrate the effectiveness of our approach for cross-domain search, regardless of the initialization scheme, on those problems when compared to each individual multiobjective algorithm. Moreover, both variants perform significantly better than some previously proposed selection hyper-heuristics for multiobjective optimization, thus significantly enhancing the opportunities for improved multiobjective optimization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available