4.4 Article

Design, Characterization, and Optimization of a Multilayer U-type Hexaferrite-Based Broadband Microwave Absorber

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages 1734-1742

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEMC.2018.2805364

Keywords

Genetic algorithm (GA); microwave-absorbing materials (MAMs); optimization; permeability; permittivity; radar cross sections (RCS); reflection loss

Funding

  1. Proof and Experimental Establishment (PXE), Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), Chandipur, Odisha

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Design and development of broadband thin multi-layer microwave-absorbing materials (MAMs) are described in this paper. Design and analysis of single-, two-, three-, and four-layered MAM are covered in detail. CoCr-based U-type hexaferrite MAMs Ba-4 (Co1-3x Cr-x)(2)Fe36O60 for various values of x (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.25) have been used as base materials. Thickness and material layers have been optimized using genetic algorithm (GA). Reflection loss (R-L) of -50 dB has been obtained using single-layered MAM at 2.21 mm thickness with effective bandwidth of 1.5 GHz. R-L value has been optimized in two-, three-, and four-layered MAM and R-L of -80.94 dB has been obtained using four-layered MAM at 1.801 mm thickness with effective bandwidth of 3.948 GHz. MAMs have been applied on an artillery shell and using electromagnetic (EM) simulation software radar cross-section (RCS) reduction simulation has been carried out for single- and multilayered MAM. RCS reduction of 9.14 dB has been obtained using single-layered MAM and a reduction of 19.86 dB has been obtained for four-layered MAM at 10 GHz. RCS reduction simulations have been carried out in entire X band and a maximum RCS reduction of 29.76 dB has been obtained at 9.5 GHz at 0 degrees aspect angle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available