4.5 Article

Blind Image Quality Estimation via Distortion Aggravation

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BROADCASTING
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 508-517

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBC.2018.2816783

Keywords

Blind image quality assessment; distortion aggravation; pseudo reference image

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61422112, 61371146, 61521062, 61527804]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditional blind image quality assessment (IQA) measures generally predict quality from a sole distorted image directly. In this paper, we first introduce multiple pseudo reference images (MPRIs) by further degrading the distorted image in several ways and to certain degrees, and then compare the similarities between the distorted image and the MPRIs. Via such distortion aggravation, we can have some references to compare with, i.e., the MPRIs, and utilize the full-reference IQA framework to compute the quality. Specifically, we apply four types and five levels of distortion aggravation to deal with the commonly encountered distortions. Local binary pattern features are extracted to describe the similarities between the distorted image and the MPRIs. The similarity scores are then utilized to estimate the overall quality. More similar to a specific pseudo reference image (PRI) indicates closer quality to this PRI. Owning to the availability of the created multiple PRIs, we can reduce the influence of image content, and infer the image quality more accurately and consistently. Validation is conducted on four mainstream natural scene image and screen content image quality assessment databases, and the proposed method is comparable to or outperforms the state-of-the-art blind IQA measures. The MATLAB source code of the proposed measure will be publicly available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available