4.8 Article

Long-term energy scenarios: Bridging the gap between socioeconomic storylines and energy modeling

Journal

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages 161-178

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.006

Keywords

Storylines; Participatory process; Quantitative scenario; Energy modeling; Energy scenario

Funding

  1. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation [SFRH/BD/27549/2006]
  2. HybCO2 [PTDC/AAC-CLI/105164/2008]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/27549/2006] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of scenarios to explore energy and low carbon futures has been widely applied. Although some studies combine qualitative scenarios with quantitative outcomes from modeling exercises, the two approaches have been extensively and separately used. Many energy scenarios are sustained only by the results of the models, which allow great technological details but neglect the interaction with social and economic factors. Using Portugal as a case study, this paper presents a framework to link socio-economic storylines, sustained by national stakeholders' workshops, with the development of quantitative energy scenarios through 2050, generated by the technology-based TIMES_PT model. The storylines highlight different visions of the country's development, including the energy system. A comparison between the energy profile from the storylines and the energy modeling outcomes was performed to assess the extent of their differences. This analysis revealed generally similar visions, with the exception of the importance of some technologies, which may affect future energy planning. We conclude that a combined method that links socio-economic storylines and energy modeling increases the robustness of energy scenario development because providing a coherent context for modeling assumptions allows better reasoning, which is most valued for the decision-making process. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available