4.6 Article

Generalisability of a Virtual Trials Method for Glycaemic Control in Intensive Care

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 65, Issue 7, Pages 1543-1553

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2686432

Keywords

Glycaemic control; insulin sensitivity; virtual trials

Funding

  1. NZ MedTech CoRE
  2. EU FP7
  3. EU RSNZ Marie Curie IRSES fund
  4. University of Canterbury Doctoral Scholarship
  5. Belgian FNRS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Elevated blood glucose (BG) concentrations (Hyperglycaemia) are a common complication in critically ill patients. Insulin therapy is commonly used to treat hyperglycaemia, but metabolic variability often results in poor BG control and low BG (hypoglycaemia). Objective: This paper presents a model-based virtual trial method for glycaemic control protocol design, and evaluates its generalisability across different populations. Methods: Model-based insulin sensitivity (SI) was used to create virtual patients from clinical data from three different ICUs in New Zealand, Hungary, and Belgium. Glycaemic results from simulation of virtual patients under their original protocol (self-simulation) and protocols from other units (cross simulation) were compared. Results: Differences were found between the three cohorts in median SI and inter-patient variability in SI. However, hour-to-hour intra-patient variability in SI was found to be consistent between cohorts. Self and cross-simulation results were found to have overall similarity and consistency, though results may differ in the first 24-48 h due to different cohort starting BG and underlying SI. Conclusions and Significance: Virtual patients and the virtual trial method were found to be generalisable across different ICUs. This virtual trial method is useful for in silico protocol design and testing, given an understanding of the underlying assumptions and limitations of this method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available