4.6 Article

The Effect of Combined Somatosensory Stimulation and Task-Specific Training on Upper Limb Function in Chronic Stroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 143-152

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1545968314533613

Keywords

stroke; electrical stimulation; upper extremity; task-specific training; rehabilitation; neurophysiology

Funding

  1. Dunhill Medical Trust [R102/0209]
  2. South London Clinical Local Research Network
  3. Department of Health through the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre
  4. King's College London
  5. King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  6. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0510-10060, RP-PG-0407-10184] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. The Dunhill Medical Trust [R102/0209] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Somatosensory stimulation (SS) is a potential adjuvant to stroke rehabilitation, but the effect on function needs further investigation. Objective. To explore the effect of combining SS with task-specific training (TST) on upper limb function and arm use in chronic stroke survivors and determine underlying mechanisms. Methods. In this double-blinded randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN 05542931), 33 patients (mean 37.7 months poststroke) were block randomized to 2 groups: active or sham SS. They received 12 sessions of 2 hours of SS (active or sham) to all 3 upper limb nerves immediately before 30 minutes of TST. The primary outcome was the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score. Secondary outcomes were time to perform the ARAT, Fugl-Meyer Assessment score (FM), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). Underlying mechanisms were explored using transcranial magnetic stimulation stimulus-response curves and intracortical inhibition. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, immediately following the intervention (mean 2 days), and 3 and 6 months (mean 96 and 190 days) after the intervention. Results. The active group (n = 16) demonstrated greater improvement in ARAT score and time immediately postintervention (between-group difference; P < .05), but not at 3- or 6-month follow-ups (P > .2). Within-group improvements were seen for both groups for ARAT and GAS, but for the active group only for FM and MAL (P < .05). Corticospinal excitability did not change. Conclusions. Long-lasting improvements in upper limb function were observed following TST. Additional benefit of SS was seen immediately post treatment, but did not persist and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available