4.6 Article

A data preprocessing strategy for metabolomics to reduce the mask effect in data analysis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCES
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00004

Keywords

metabolomics; data preprocessing; pattern recognition; biomarkers; differential metabolites

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21375011]
  2. State Key Science and Technology Project for Infectious Diseases [2012ZX10002-011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highlights Developed a data preprocessing strategy to cope with missing values and mask effects in data analysis from high variation of abundant metabolites. A new method- 'x-VAST' was developed to amend the measurement deviation enlargement. Applying the above strategy, several low abundant masked differential metabolites were rescued. Metabolomics is a booming research field. Its success highly relies on the discovery of differential metabolites by comparing different data sets (for example, patients vs. controls). One of the challenges is that differences of the low abundant metabolites between groups are often masked by the high variation of abundant metabolites. In order to solve this challenge, a novel data preprocessing strategy consisting of three steps was proposed in this study. In step 1, a 'modified 80%' rule was used to reduce effect of missing values; in step 2, unit-variance and Pareto scaling methods were used to reduce the mask effect from the abundant metabolites. In step 3, in order to fix the adverse effect of scaling, stability information of the variables deduced from intensity information and the class information, was used to assign suitable weights to the variables. When applying to an LC/MS based metabolomics dataset from chronic hepatitis B patients study and two simulated datasets, the mask effect was found to be partially eliminated and several new low abundant differential metabolites were rescued.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available