4.7 Article

Drift-Insensitive Features for Learning Artificial Olfaction in E-Nose System

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 18, Issue 17, Pages 7173-7182

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2853674

Keywords

Cosine similarity; electronic nose; gas sensors; particle swarm optimization; sensor drift

Funding

  1. Qatar National Research Fund (Qatar Foundation) through NPRP [NPRP9-421-2-170]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Domain features and independence maximization are proposed recently for learning the domain-invariant subspace to handle drift in gas sensors. The proposed domain features were the acquisition time and a unique device label for the collected gas samples. In real-time applications of gas sensing, a sample is usually collected using a multi-sensor sensing approach, so a unique device label is not possible in that case, which results in performance degradation. Similarly, semisupervised learning algorithms are proposed to handle drift for gas sensing applications, but getting data from the target domain for the calibration of the system is not always possible. To address these problems, this paper proposes a novel approach to handle the drift in gas sensors, with the following merits: 1) a new classification system based on cosine similarity is developed and features are exploited using a metaheuristic; the outcome is drift-insensitive features that are capable of handling drift in gas sensors; 2) the proposed system is robust against the drift without requiring any re-calibration, domain transformation, or data from target domain; 3) the classification system is an integration of two classifiers; this enables the system to outperform other baseline methods; and 4) only median values of drift-insensitive features are used for learning, so the system requires very few memory cells for storage. The proposed system is validated against a large-scale data set of 13910 samples from six gases, with 36 months' drift and has demonstrated 86.01% classification accuracy, which is 2.76% improvement, when compared with other state-of-the-art methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available