4.4 Article

Integrating LINMAP and TOPSIS methods for hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 257-269

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/IFS-141296

Keywords

Hesitant fuzzy set; multiple attribute decision making; linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preference (LINMAP); technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71171112]
  2. Research Funds for the General Virtual Economy [GX2013-1017 (M)]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [NS2014086]
  4. Philosophy and Social Science of Colleges in Jiangsu Province [2012ZDIXM007, 2012JDXM003]
  5. Scientific Innovation Research of College Graduate in Jiangsu Province [CXLX13_171]
  6. Young Teachers' Science Foundation of Anhui University of Technology [QZ201321]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The linear programming technique for multidimensional analysis of preference (LINMAP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) are two well-known methods for dealing with the multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems. In this paper, we further extend the LINMAP to accommodate hesitant fuzzy environment and propose a new approach to solve the MADM problems with hesitant fuzzy information. Then, an integrated method that combines the LINMAP and TOPSIS is developed. In this methodology, we take advantage of the LINMAP to determine the attribute weights objectively and thus overcome the drawbacks of the TOPSIS. Meanwhile the TOPSIS that considers both the positive ideal solution (PIS) and the negative ideal solution (NIS) can make up the disadvantages of the LINMAP. In order to measure consistency and inconsistency between the ranking order of alternatives and the decision maker's preference, two indices based on PIS and NIS are defined. Moreover, a linear programming model that can be used for minimizing the total inconsistency is constructed to determine the attribute weights. By using the TOPSIS, we obtain the most appropriate alternative. Finally, two numerical examples are given to demonstrate the implementation process of the developed approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available