4.7 Article

SPECTROSCOPIC OBSERVATIONS OF A CORONAL LOOP: BASIC PHYSICAL PLASMA PARAMETERS ALONG THE FULL LOOP LENGTH

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 800, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/140

Keywords

Sun: atmosphere; Sun: corona; Sun: transition region; Sun: UV radiation

Funding

  1. INSPIRE Faculty Fellowship of the Department of Science and Technology (DST), India
  2. STFC (UK)
  3. JAXA (Japan)
  4. NAOJ (Japan)
  5. NASA (USA)
  6. ESA (Norway)
  7. NSC (Norway)
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000636/1, ST/J001570/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. STFC [ST/J001570/1, ST/L000636/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coronal loops are the basic structures of the solar transition region and corona. Understanding of the physical mechanisms behind the loop heating, plasma flows, and filling are still considered a major challenge in solar physics. The mechanism(s) should be able to supply mass to the corona from the chromosphere and to heat the plasma over 1 MK within a small distance of a few hundred kilometers from the chromosphere to the corona. This problem makes coronal loops an interesting target for detailed study. In this study, we focus on spectroscopic observations of a coronal loop observed in its full length in various spectral lines as recorded by the Extreme-ultraviolet Imaging Spectrometer on board Hinode. We derive physical plasma parameters such as electron density, temperature, pressure, column depth, and filling factors along the loop length from one footpoint to the another. The obtained parameters are used to infer whether the observed coronal loop is overdense or underdense with respect to gravitational stratification of the solar atmosphere. These new measurements of physical plasma parameters, from one footpoint to another, provide important constraints on the modeling of the mass and energy balance in coronal loops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available