4.6 Article

Genome-wide QTL analysis of meat quality-related traits in a large F2 intercross between Landrace and Korean native pigs

Journal

GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-014-0080-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program [PJ008016]
  2. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development, Republic of Korea [PJ01012301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We conducted a genome-wide linkage analysis to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) that influence meat quality-related traits in a large F-2 intercross between Landrace and Korean native pigs. Thirteen meat quality-related traits of the m. longissimus lumborum et thoracis were measured in more than 830 F-2 progeny. All these animals were genotyped with 173 microsatellite markers located throughout the pig genome, and the GridQTL program based on the least squares regression model was used to perform the QTL analysis. Results: We identified 23 genome-wide significant QTL in eight chromosome regions (SSC1, 2, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, and 16) (SSC for Sus Scrofa) and detected 51 suggestive QTL in the 17 chromosome regions. QTL that affect 10 meat quality traits were detected on SSC12 and were highly significant at the genome-wide level. In particular, the QTL with the largest effect affected crude fat percentage and explained 22.5% of the phenotypic variance (F-ratio = 278.0 under the additive model, nominal P = 5.5 x 10(-55)). Interestingly, the QTL on SSC12 that influenced meat quality traits showed an obvious trend for co-localization. Conclusions: Our results confirm several previously reported QTL. In addition, we identified novel QTL for meat quality traits, which together with the associated positional candidate genes improve the knowledge on the genetic structure that underlies genetic variation for meat quality traits in pigs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available