4.5 Article

The influence of extraversion on brain activity at baseline and during the experience and expectation of visceral pain

Journal

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 248-253

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.024

Keywords

Extraversion; Visceral pain; fMRI; Human brain; Pain anticipation; Personality

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26460898] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eysenck proposed a 'trait theory' of personality, the dimensions of which encompass numerous individual qualities. Whilst the influence of neuroticism on the brain processing of pain is well described, the role of extraversion, to date, has not been systematically investigated. Our aim was to address this knowledge gap using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Extraversion was measured in 33 healthy volunteers (17 males, mean age 29 years [range 20-53]) using the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. fMRI data were acquired using a 3T MRI scanner during rest, pain anticipation, and painful oesophageal balloon distention. The effect of extraversion on flVIRI responses was determined. Extraversion scores varied (range 6-22) and did not influence pain threshold or rating. High extraversion was associated with significantly greater activity in the left cuneus during rest (p <= 0.001), and the right insula during both anticipation (p <= 0.0002) and pain (p <= 0.0008). Low extraversion was associated with significantly greater brain activity in the bilateral precuneus, bilateral lingual gyrus, right inferior temporal gyrus, left fusiform gyrus and left superior parietal lobule during pain anticipation (all p <= 0.0001). These results suggest that extraversion is associated with differences in the brain processing of visceral pain. Future studies of visceral pain, using fMRI, should control for extraversion. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available