4.3 Article

Learning a Generative Probabilistic Grammar of Experience: A Process-Level Model of Language Acquisition

Journal

COGNITIVE SCIENCE
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 227-267

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12140

Keywords

Generative grammar; Learning; Graph-based representation; Incremental learning; Linguistic experience; Statistical learning; Grammar of behavior; Language learning

Funding

  1. Tel Aviv University
  2. Wolf Foundation
  3. Israel Science Foundation [1312/11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce a set of biologically and computationally motivated design choices for modeling the learning of language, or of other types of sequential, hierarchically structured experience and behavior, and describe an implemented system that conforms to these choices and is capable of unsupervised learning from raw natural-language corpora. Given a stream of linguistic input, our model incrementally learns a grammar that captures its statistical patterns, which can then be used to parse or generate new data. The grammar constructed in this manner takes the form of a directed weighted graph, whose nodes are recursively (hierarchically) defined patterns over the elements of the input stream. We evaluated the model in seventeen experiments, grouped into five studies, which examined, respectively, (a) the generative ability of grammar learned from a corpus of natural language, (b) the characteristics of the learned representation, (c) sequence segmentation and chunking, (d) artificial grammar learning, and (e) certain types of structure dependence. The model's performance largely vindicates our design choices, suggesting that progress in modeling language acquisition can be made on a broad frontranging from issues of generativity to the replication of human experimental findingsby bringing biological and computational considerations, as well as lessons from prior efforts, to bear on the modeling approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available