3.9 Article

Integrated geophysical research of Bourbonic shipwrecks sunk in the Gulf of Naples in 1799

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE-REPORTS
Volume 1, Issue -, Pages 64-72

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2014.11.003

Keywords

Geophysical survey; Underwater archeology; Bourbonic shipwrecks; GIS

Categories

Funding

  1. Naples Underwater Study Center
  2. Restoring Ancient Stabiae Foundation
  3. Fire Department of the Province of Naples

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 1798, Ferdinand IV of Bourbon, King of Naples, lost the battle with the French for control of the Papal States and was obliged to escape from Naples. On January 9, 1799, Admiral Campbell sank the ships that remained in the port due to a lack of crews, by setting them on fire on the orders of Admiral Nelson. This action was taken to prevent the remaining ships from falling into the hands of the French, who were about to enter the city. This article describes the results of an integrated geophysical survey undertaken to detect the warships sunk in 1799. The initial study area was broadly defined by reference to a historical map of 1828, which purported to show the position of the shipwrecks. The geophysical methods employed consisted of the seismic-stratigraphic method (sub-bottom profiler), the morphologic method (acoustic image-side-scan sonar) and the magnetometric method. The objectives of the surveys were to accurately locate the shipwrecks and to characterize the seabed sediments and wrecks themselves in order to understand the process of the sinking of the vessels. Two of the shipwrecks, the St.Gioacchino and the Pallade vessels, were located using these non-invasive methods, partially buried within soft seabed sediments. Future research of the sites will be undertaken by appropriately qualified underwater archaeologists who will collect field data that can build on and verify the results of these surveys. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available