4.4 Article

Global quality assessment of liver allograft C4d staining during acute antibody-mediated rejection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue

Journal

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue -, Pages 144-155

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.12.007

Keywords

Complement fragment 4d; Liver allograft; Antibody-mediated rejection; Method; Tissue microarray

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Discussion of liver antibody-mediated rejection during the 2011, 2013, and 2015 Banff liver sessions raised concerns over reliability of complement fragment 4d (C4d) staining, precipitating a global survey followed by a tissue microarray staining quality assessment study among centers on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Tissue microarray sections containing tissue plugs of resected native and allograft (with acute antibody-mediated rejection) liver, heart, and kidney (n = 33 total cores) were sent to 31 centers for C4d staining using local method(s) and pathologist scoring. Digital whole-slide images (n = 40) were then semiquantitatively scored by 7 experts for background, distribution, and intensity of portal vein and capillary, hepatic artery, sinusoidal, and central vein endothelia and portal and central stromal staining. Results showed that strong and diffuse portal vein and capillary C4d staining, as determined by both local and central pathologists, clearly distinguished allografts showing acute antibody-mediated rejection from native livers and from those with evidence of weaker donor-specific antibody. Downstream vascular endothelial cell C4d staining and assessment were more variable and difficult to identify. C4d staining in the majority of laboratories reliably detects acute liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection in formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissues. Assessment should focus on portal veins and capillaries, sinusoids, and central veins present in peripheral core needle biopsies. C4d staining in one organ does not always translate to staining in another. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available