4.5 Review

Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 27, Issue R2, Pages R195-R208

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddy163

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [208806/Z/17/Z]
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12013/1]
  3. MRC [MC_UU_12013/1, MC_UU_00011/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Wellcome Trust [208806/Z/17/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pleiotropy, the phenomenon of a single genetic variant influencing multiple traits, is likely widespread in the human genome. If pleiotropy arises because the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) influences one trait, which in turn influences another ('vertical pleiotropy'), then Mendelian randomization (MR) can be used to estimate the causal influence between the traits. Of prime focus among the many limitations to MR is the unprovable assumption that apparent pleiotropic associations are mediated by the exposure (i.e. reflect vertical pleiotropy), and do not arise due to SNPs influencing the two traits through independent pathways ('horizontal pleiotropy'). The burgeoning treasure trove of genetic associations yielded through genome wide association studies makes for a tantalizing prospect of phenome-wide causal inference. Recent years have seen substantial attention devoted to the problem of horizontal pleiotropy, and in this review we outline how newly developed methods can be used together to improve the reliability of MR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available