4.5 Article

In vivo Genome Editing Partially Restores Alpha1-Antitrypsin in a Murine Model of AAT Deficiency

Journal

HUMAN GENE THERAPY
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 853-860

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/hum.2017.225

Keywords

alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency; AAT; CRISPR; genome editing; AAV; mouse model

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [DP2HL137167, P01HL131471, R01 DK098252, R24OD018259]
  2. Lung Cancer Research Foundation
  3. American Cancer Society [129056-RSG-16-093]
  4. Hyundai Hope on Wheels
  5. ALS Association
  6. National Institute of General Medicine, National Institutes of Health [T32 GM107000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) genome editing holds promise in the treatment of genetic diseases that currently lack effective long-term therapies. Patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency develop progressive lung disease due to the loss of AAT's antiprotease function and liver disease due to a toxic gain of function of the common mutant allele. However, it remains unknown whether CRISPR-mediated AAT correction in the liver, where AAT is primarily expressed, can correct either or both defects. Here we show that AAV delivery of CRISPR can effectively correct Z-AAT mutation in the liver of a transgenic mouse model. Specifically, we co-injected two AAVs: one expressing Cas9 and another encoding an AAT guide RNA and homology-directed repair template. In both neonatal and adult mice, this treatment partially restored M-AAT in the serum. Furthermore, deep sequencing confirmed both indel mutations and precise gene correction in the liver, permitting careful analysis of gene editing events in vivo. This study demonstrates a proof of concept for the application of CRISPR-Cas9 technology to correct AAT mutations in vivo and validates continued exploration of this approach for the treatment of patients with AAT deficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available