Journal
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 787-790Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2018.1446322
Keywords
assumptions; culturomics; Google Trends; search volume; validation
Categories
Funding
- FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/118635/2016]
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/118635/2016] Funding Source: FCT
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In a recent article, Durmusoglu (2017) proposes the use of Google Trends data to study public understanding of environmental risks and claims such data do not require validation. Here, I show this assumption is false and that some of the terms used by the author fail a validity assessment, ultimately affecting the overall value of the study. Authors and reviewers of studies aiming to take advantage of digital data should adopt an enthusiastic but critical approach, particularly with regards to key assumptions and defining methodological aspects.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available