4.4 Article

Sleep in the modern family: protective family routines for child and adolescent sleep

Journal

SLEEP HEALTH
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 15-27

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleh.2014.12.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sunovion
  2. Teva
  3. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Dinsmore LLC
  4. National Institutes of Health
  5. National Sleep Foundation
  6. Apnicure
  7. UCB Biosciences
  8. Aerial Biopharma
  9. Glaxo-Smith-Kline
  10. Novo Nordisk
  11. Vanda Pharmaceuticals
  12. Neurim Pharmaceuticals
  13. Apnex Medical, Inc
  14. Pfizer, Inc
  15. Merck. Dr Emsellem participated on Advisory Boards for Vanda Pharmaceuticals
  16. Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  17. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  18. National Institute of Aging
  19. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
  20. National Sleep Foundation Poll Scholar

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study objectives: The overall objective of the 2014 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Poll Sleep in the Modern Family was to obtain a current picture of sleep in families with at least 1 school-aged child. Design: Cross-sectional poll. Setting: Internet-based interview. Participants: Nationally representative Internet panel of US households with a child 6-17 years. Measurements and results: Primary measures included parental perception of the importance of sleep, parental and child sleep quality, child sleep duration and habits, technology in bedroom, and family rules. Parents/ guardians (n = 1103: mean age, 42; 54% female) completed the survey. Although the majority of parents endorsed the importance of sleep, 90% of children obtain less sleep than recommended. Significant predictors of age-adjusted sufficient sleep duration (estimated conservatively as >= 9 hours for ages 6-11 years and >= 8 hours for ages 12-17 years) included parent education, regular enforcement of rules about caffeine. and whether children left technology on in their bedroom overnight. Significant predictors of excellent sleep quality included whether a bedtime was always enforced and whether children left technology on overnight. Conclusions: Children generally have better age-appropriate sleep in the presence of household rules and regular sleep-wake routines. Sufficient sleep quantity and adequate sleep quality were protected by well-established rules of sleep hygiene (limited caffeine and regular bedtime). In contrast, sleep deficiency was more likely to be present when parents and children had electronic devices on in the bedroom after bedtime. Public health intervention goals for sleep health might focus on reducing the encroachment of technology and media into time for sleep and supporting well-known sleep hygiene principles. (C) 2015 National Sleep Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available