4.2 Article

Influence of Thermal Ageing on Microstructure and Tensile Properties of P92 Steel

Journal

HIGH TEMPERATURE MATERIALS AND PROCESSES
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 425-435

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/htmp-2016-0040

Keywords

P92 steel; thermal ageing; microstructure; tensile strengths

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microstructure and tensile properties of P92 steel in the normalized and tempered, and thermal aged at 923 K for 5000 h and 10,000 h conditions have been investigated. Laves phase precipitate was observed in the thermal-aged steels. The size of Laves phase precipitate increased with increase in thermal exposure. This was also confirmed from the observation that the area fraction of Laves phase precipitate was higher in the 5000 h aged condition which decreased with further increase in thermal exposure. On the other hand, the size and area fraction of M23C6 precipitate were found increased in the 5000 h aged steel, further continued to enhanced precipitation of fine M23C6 in the 10,000 h aged steel. This resulted in significant increase in area fraction and comparable size with the steel aged for 5000 h. Hardness of the steel was decreased with increase in the duration of ageing. Thermal-aged steels exhibited lower yield stress, ultimate tensile strength and relatively higher ductility in comparison with steel in the normalized and tempered condition. The increase in lath width and recovery of dislocation structure under thermal-aged condition resulted in lower tensile strength and hardness. An extensive Laves phase formation and coarsening by loss of tungsten in the matrix led to decrease in the tensile strength predominantly in the 5000 h aged steel. The tensile strength of 10,000 h aged steel was comparable with that of 5000 h aged steel due to enhanced precipitation of fine M23C6 in the steel due to enhanced mobility of carbon in the absence of tungsten in the matrix.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available