4.2 Article

Responding to Concerns About a Study of Infant Overnight Care Postseparation, With Comments on Consensus: Reply to Warshak (2014)

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 111-119

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/h0101018

Keywords

parental separation; overnight stays; infants; young children; attachment; shared parenting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Richard Warshak (2014) published a consensus report in this journal (Vol. 20, No. 1) documenting a policy position on infants and overnight care following parental separation. He asserts that [t]here is no evidence to support postponing the introduction of regular and frequent involvement, including over-nights, of both parents with their babies and toddlers (p. 60). To support this assertion, Warshak presents a series of detailed concerns about an Australian study the authors conducted, some of which involve serious misrepresentations of our aims, methodology, and findings. In this reply, we clarify the purpose, context, and limitations of our study, and refute one of Warshak's central theses: that our study's design and results favor primary maternal care of young children and discourage overnights and shared parenting for fathers. We appraise the Warshak article, and consider whether other approaches to consensus statements and to policy dialogue might better serve families involved in the family law system, particularly when emotive debates such as the overnight care of young children cannot yet be resolved by science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available