4.7 Article

BUILDING LATE-TYPE SPIRAL GALAXIES BY IN-SITU AND EX-SITU STAR FORMATION

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 799, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/184

Keywords

galaxies: formation; galaxies: structure; Galaxy: evolution; Galaxy: formation; Galaxy: halo; methods: numerical

Funding

  1. NSF [OIA-1124453, AST-1229745]
  2. NASA [NNX12AF87G]
  3. Office Of The Director
  4. Office of Integrative Activities [1124453] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. NASA [NNX12AF87G, 75186] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyze the formation and evolution of the stellar components in Eris, a 120 pc resolution cosmological hydrodynamic simulation of a late-type spiral galaxy. The simulation includes the effects of a uniform UV background, a delayed-radiative-cooling scheme for supernova feedback, and a star formation recipe based on a high gas density threshold. It allows a detailed study of the relative contributions of in-situ (within the main host) and ex-situ (within satellite galaxies) star formation to each major Galactic component in a close Milky Way analog. We investigate these two star-formation channels as a function of galactocentric distance, along different lines of sight above and along the disk plane, and as a function of cosmic time. We find that: (1) approximately 70% of today's stars formed in-situ; (2) more than two thirds of the ex-situ stars formed within satellites after infall; (3) the majority of ex-situ stars are found today in the disk and in the bulge; (4) the stellar halo is dominated by ex-situ stars, whereas in-situ stars dominate the mass profile at distances less than or similar to 5 kpc from the center at high latitudes; and (5) approximately 25% of the inner, r less than or similar to 0 kpc, halo is composed of in-situ stars that have been displaced from their original birth sites during Eris' early assembly history.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available