4.5 Article

Proposed diagnostic criteria for acute-on-chronic liver failure in Japan

Journal

HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 219-224

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13066

Keywords

ACLF; acute-on-chronic liver failure; APASL; cirrhosis; EASL-Clif Consortium

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To establish diagnostic criteria for acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) in Japan, the Intractable Hepato-Biliary Disease Study Group of Japan undertook a multicenter pilot survey for patients fulfilling the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL), Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure (EASL-Clif) Consortium, or Chinese Medical Association (CMA) diagnostic criteria for ACLF. The APASL criteria were suitable for screening Japanese patients with ACLF when patients whose conditions were triggered by gastrointestinal bleeding were included within the disease entity, and the EASL-Clif Consortium criteria were useful for classifying the severity of the patients' conditions. Based on these observations, the Study Group proposed the following diagnostic criteria for ACLF in Japan: patients with cirrhosis and a Child-Pugh score of 5-9 should be diagnosed as having ACLF when a deterioration of liver function (serum bilirubin level 5.0mg/dL and prothrombin time value 40% of the standardized values and/or international normalization rate 1.5) caused by severe liver damage develops within 28days after acute insults, such as alcohol abuse, bacterial infection, gastrointestinal bleeding, or the exacerbation of underlying liver diseases. The severities of the patients can be classified into four grades depending on the extent of the deterioration in organ functions, including kidney, cerebral, blood coagulation, circulatory and respiratory functions, as well as liver function. The usefulness of these novel criteria should be validated prospectively in a large-scale cohort in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available