4.5 Article

Association between sarcopenia and osteoporosis in chronic liver disease

Journal

HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 11, Pages 893-904

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13192

Keywords

chronic liver disease; cirrhosis; osteoporosis; sarcopenia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Sarcopenia and osteoporosis are important complications in chronic liver disease (CLD). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between sarcopenia and osteoporosis in patients with CLD. Methods: We retrospectively investigated the relationship between sarcopenia and osteoporosis in 112 CLD patients (57 men and 55 women), including 40 cirrhotic patients (36%), by measuring the appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI) using bio-impedance analysis. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results: The sarcopenia rate was 13% (14/112), and the osteoporosis and osteopenia rates were 17% (19/112) and 65% (73/112), respectively. The rate of osteoporosis was significant and high in patients with sarcopenia or cirrhosis. In linear regression analysis, sarcopenia was significantly associated with the BMD of the lumbar spine (coefficient = -0.149, P = 0.014) and the femur neck (coefficient = -0.110, P = 0.003). Cirrhosis was also significantly associated with low BMD of the lumbar spine (coefficient = -0.160, P < 0.001) and the femur neck (coefficient = -0.066, P = 0.015). In the logistic analysis, sarcopenia (odds ratio = 6.16, P = 0.039) and cirrhosis (odds ratio = 15.8, P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for osteoporosis. The ASMI cut-off values for osteoporosis were 7.33kg/m(2) in men and 5.71 kg/m(2) in women. Conclusions: Sarcopenia was closely associated with osteoporosis, and a low ASMI was a potential predictor of osteoporosis in CLD patients. Screening for BMD might be required to detect osteoporosis in cirrhotic patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available