4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Dimension-selective attention as a possible driver of dynamic, context-dependent re-weighting in speech processing

Journal

HEARING RESEARCH
Volume 366, Issue -, Pages 50-64

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.06.014

Keywords

Speech perception; Auditory selective attention; Auditory learning; Auditory plasticity; Perceptual weight

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. Rothberg Research Award in Human Brain Imaging of Carnegie Mellon University
  3. Marie Curie Sklodowska Actions of the European Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The contribution of acoustic dimensions to an auditory percept is dynamically adjusted and reweighted based on prior experience about how informative these dimensions are across the long-term and short-term environment. This is especially evident in speech perception, where listeners differentially weight information across multiple acoustic dimensions, and use this information selectively to update expectations about future sounds. The dynamic and selective adjustment of how acoustic input dimensions contribute to perception has made it tempting to conceive of this as a form of non-spatial auditory selective attention. Here, we review several human speech perception phenomena that might be consistent with auditory selective attention although, as of yet, the literature does not definitively support a mechanistic tie. We relate these human perceptual phenomena to illustrative nonhuman animal neurobiological findings that offer informative guideposts in how to test mechanistic connections. We next present a novel empirical approach that can serve as a methodological bridge from human research to animal neurobiological studies. Finally, we describe four preliminary results that demonstrate its utility in advancing understanding of human non-spatial dimension-based auditory selective attention. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available