4.8 Article

Outcome measures in coeliac disease trials: the Tampere recommendations

Journal

GUT
Volume 67, Issue 8, Pages 1410-1424

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314853

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [522-2A09-195]
  2. Swedish Society of Medicine
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  4. Ministry of Research and Development (BMBF)
  5. Leibniz Foundation
  6. Biocard
  7. Simtomax
  8. Academy of Finland
  9. Competitive Research Funding of the Tampere University Hospital
  10. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  11. Hungarian Research Fund [NKFI 120392]
  12. Competitive State Research Financing of the Tampere University Hospital [9U038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective A gluten-free diet is the only treatment option of coeliac disease, but recently an increasing number of trials have begun to explore alternative treatment strategies. We aimed to review the literature on coeliac disease therapeutic trials and issue recommendations for outcome measures. Design Based on a literature review of 10 062 references, we (17 researchers and 2 patient representatives from 10 countries) reviewed the use and suitability of both clinical and non-clinical outcome measures. We then made expert-based recommendations for use of these outcomes in coeliac disease trials and identified areas where research is needed. Results We comment on the use of histology, serology, clinical outcome assessment (including patient-reported outcomes), quality of life and immunological tools including gluten immunogenic peptides for trials in coeliac disease. Conclusion C areful evaluation and reporting of outcome measures will increase transparency and comparability of coeliac disease therapeutic trials, and will benefit patients, healthcare and the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available