4.7 Article

OPTICAL OBSERVATIONS OF PSR J2021+3651 IN THE DRAGONFLY NEBULA WITH THE GTC

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 802, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/17

Keywords

pulsars: general; pulsars: individual (PSR J2021+3651); stars: neutron

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [14-12-00316]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PSR J2021+3651 is a 17 kyr old rotation powered pulsar detected in the radio, X-rays, and gamma-rays. It powers a torus-like pulsar wind nebula with jets, dubbed the Dragonfly, which is very similar to that of the Vela pulsar. The Dragonfly is likely associated with the extended TeV source VER J2019+368 and extended radio emission. We conducted first deep optical observations with the Gran Telescopio Canarias in the Sloan r' band to search for optical counterparts of the pulsar and its nebula. No counterparts were detected down to r' greater than or similar to 27.2 and greater than or similar to 24.8 for the point-like pulsar and the compact X-ray nebula, respectively. We also reanalyzed Chandra archival X-ray data taking into account an interstellar extinction-distance relation, constructed by us for the Dragonfly line of sight using the red-clump stars as standard candles. This allowed us to constrain the distance to the pulsar, D = 1.8(-1.4)(+1.7) kpc at 90% confidence. It is much smaller than the dispersion measure distance of similar to 12 kpc but compatible with a gamma-ray pseudo-distance of 1 kpc. Based on that and the optical upper limits, we conclude that PSR J2021+3651, similar to the Vela pulsar, is a very inefficient nonthermal emitter in the optical and X-rays, while its gamma-ray efficiency is consistent with an average efficiency for gamma-pulsars of similar age. Our optical flux upper limit for the pulsar is consistent with the long-wavelength extrapolation of its X-ray spectrum while the nebula flux upper limit does not constrain the respective extrapolation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available