4.7 Article

Further evidence for a time-dependent initial mass function in massive early-type galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 448, Issue 1, Pages L82-L86

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv003

Keywords

stars: luminosity function, mass function; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: star formation; galaxies: stellar content

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [AYA2013-48226-C3-1-P]
  2. STFC [ST/K000977/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K000977/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spectroscopic analyses of gravity-sensitive line strengths give growing evidence towards an excess of low-mass stars in massive early-type galaxies (ETGs). Such a scenario requires a bottom-heavy initial mass function (IMF). However, strong constraints can be imposed if we take into account galactic chemical enrichment. We extend the analysis of Weidner et al. and consider the functional form of bottom-heavy IMFs used in recent works, where the high-mass end slope is kept fixed to the Salpeter value, and a free parameter is introduced to describe the slope at stellar masses below some pivot mass scale (M < M-P = 0.5 M circle dot). We find that no such time-independent parametrization is capable to reproduce the full set of constraints in the stellar populations of massive ETGs - resting on the assumption that the analysis of gravity-sensitive line strengths leads to a mass fraction at birth in stars with mass M < 0.5M circle dot above 60 per cent. Most notably, the large amount of metal-poor gas locked in low-mass stars during the early, strong phases of star formation results in average stellar metallicities [M/H] less than or similar to -0.6, well below the solar value. The conclusions are unchanged if either the low-mass end cutoff, or the pivot mass are left as free parameters, strengthening the case for a time-dependent IMF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available