4.7 Article

Reactive nitrogen spatial intensity (NrSI): A new indicator for environmental sustainability

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.06.001

Keywords

Sustainable development; Reactive nitrogen; Nitrogen footprints; Land use; Spatial intensity

Funding

  1. University of Melbourne
  2. International Fee Remission Scholarship
  3. BIP reinvestment funds of the Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences
  4. Meat and Livestock Australia
  5. Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award scheme [DE170100423]
  6. Australia-China Joint Research Centre Healthy soils for sustainable food production and environmental quality [ACSRF48165]
  7. Dr Frank Cope Scholarship for Agronomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen (N) footprints quantify the anthropogenic release of reactive nitrogen (Nr) from resource consumption, but do not connect to the resulting environmental impacts. Australia has the largest measured N footprint, but is generally perceived as a green and clean country. To explore this discrepancy, we developed an indicator, Nr spatial intensity (NrSI) that estimates the intensity of the Nr loss on a per area basis. The system boundary of the N footprint is any resource consumption by an entity, regardless of where the Nr is released. In contrast, the NrSI framework maps the geographical locations of anthropogenic Nr losses. We found that the pattern of NrSI among nations was very different from that of their N footprint. Factors that affect the comparison include land area, population density, and the import and export of food. Australia had the lowest NrSI (6 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1)) while the Netherlands had the highest NrSI (217 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1)) of the seven nations studied. In concert with the N footprint, the NrSI could be used as a benchmark for assessing the environmental pressure from Nr in a nation and for setting priorities of mitigating Nr pollution to help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available