4.8 Article

Prediction of enteric methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle using an intercontinental database

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 3368-3389

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14094

Keywords

dairy cows; dry matter intake; enteric methane emissions; methane intensity; methane yield; prediction models

Funding

  1. FONDECYT [11110410, 1151355]
  2. Fontagro [FTG/RF-1028-RG]
  3. Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs [BO-20-007-006]
  4. Austin Eugene Lyons Fellowship
  5. Academy of Finland [281337]
  6. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2014-67003-21979, NH00616-R]
  7. Department of Animal Science, Pennsylvania State University
  8. College of Agricultural Sciences, Pennsylvania State University
  9. Dutch Dairy Board (Zoetermeer, The Netherlands)
  10. University of California, Davis Sesnon Endowed Chair Program
  11. Pennsylvania Soybean Board
  12. Agricultural GHG Research Initiative for Ireland
  13. Northeast Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education
  14. Swedish Infrastructure for Ecosystem Science (SITES) at Robacksdalen Research Station
  15. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra
  16. UK)
  17. Defra
  18. Scottish Government
  19. Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (Northern Ireland)
  20. Welsh Government as part of the UK's Agricultural GHG Research Platform projects
  21. Swiss Federal Office of Agriculture, Berne, Switzerland
  22. French National Research Agency [ANR-13-JFAC-0003-01]
  23. New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station
  24. Product Board Animal Feed (Zoetermeer, The Netherlands)
  25. PMI Nutritional Additives
  26. DSM Nutritional Products
  27. German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMBL) through the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE)
  28. European Commission through SMEthane [FP7-SME-262270]
  29. INIA, Spain [MIT01-GLOBALNET-EEZ]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enteric methane (CH4) production from cattle contributes to global greenhouse gas emissions. Measurement of enteric CH4 is complex, expensive, and impractical at large scales; therefore, models are commonly used to predict CH4 production. However, building robust prediction models requires extensive data from animals under different management systems worldwide. The objectives of this study were to (1) collate a global database of enteric CH4 production from individual lactating dairy cattle; (2) determine the availability of key variables for predicting enteric CH4 production (g/day per cow), yield [g/kg dry matter intake (DMI)], and intensity (g/kg energy corrected milk) and their respective relationships; (3) develop intercontinental and regional models and cross-validate their performance; and (4) assess the trade-off between availability of on-farm inputs and CH4 prediction accuracy. The intercontinental database covered Europe (EU), the United States (US), and Australia (AU). A sequential approach was taken by incrementally adding key variables to develop models with increasing complexity. Methane emissions were predicted by fitting linear mixed models. Within model categories, an intercontinental model with the most available independent variables performed best with root mean square prediction error (RMSPE) as a percentage of mean observed value of 16.6%, 14.7%, and 19.8% for intercontinental, EU, and United States regions, respectively. Less complex models requiring only DMI had predictive ability comparable to complex models. Enteric CH4 production, yield, and intensity prediction models developed on an intercontinental basis had similar performance across regions, however, intercepts and slopes were different with implications for prediction. Revised CH4 emission conversion factors for specific regions are required to improve CH4 production estimates in national inventories. In conclusion, information on DMI is required for good prediction, and other factors such as dietary neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentration, improve the prediction. For enteric CH4 yield and intensity prediction, information on milk yield and composition is required for better estimation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available