4.6 Article

Effect of shearing rate on the behavior of geogrid-reinforced railroad ballast under direct shear conditions

Journal

GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 251-256

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.12.001

Keywords

Geosynthetics; Ballast; Large-scale direct shear test; Ballast-geogrid interfaces; Rate of shearing (S-r); Friction angle (phi)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of large-scale direct shear tests were conducted to investigate the behavior of unreinforced and geogrid reinforced ballast at different rates of shearing. Fresh granite ballast with an average particle size (D-50) of 42 nun and five geogrids having different aperture shapes and sizes was used in this study. Tests were performed at different normal stresses (sigma(n)) ranging from 35 kPa to 140 kPa and at different rates of shearing (S-r) ranging from 2.5 to 10.0 mm/min. The laboratory test results revealed that the shear strength of ballast was significantly Influenced by the rate of shearing. The internal friction angle of ballast (phi) was found to decrease from 66.5 degrees to 58 degrees when the shearing rate (S-r)was increased from 2.5 to 10.0 mm/min. It is further observed that the interface shear strength has improved significantly when the ballast was reinforced with geogrids. The interface efficiency factor (alpha), defined as the ratio of the shear strength of the interface to the internal shear strength of ballast, varies from 0.83 to 1.06. The sieve analysis of samples after the testing reveals that a significant amount of particle breakage occurs during shearing. The value of breakage, evaluated in terms of Marsal's breakage index (B-g), increases from 5.12 to 13.24% with an increase in shearing rates from 2.5 to 10.0 mm/min. Moreover, the Influence of aperture shape and size of geogrid on the behavior of ballast-geogrid interfaces was also examined in this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available