4.7 Article

Resonant Scattering of Radiation Belt Electrons by Off-Equatorial Magnetosonic Waves

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 1228-1236

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017GL075788

Keywords

off-equatorial MS waves; butterfly pitch angle distributions; radiation belt electrons

Funding

  1. NSFC [41674163, 41474141, 41204120]
  2. Hubei Province Natural Science Excellent Youth Foundation [2016CFA044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fast magnetosonic (MS) waves are commonly regarded as electromagnetic waves that are characteristically confined within +/- 3 degrees of the geomagnetic equator. We report two typical off-equatorial MS events observed by Van Allen Probes, that is, the 8 May 2014 event that occurred at the geomagnetic latitudes of 7.5 degrees-9.2 degrees both inside and outside the plasmasphere with the wave amplitude up to 590 pT and the 9 January 2014 event that occurred at the latitudes of-(15.7 degrees-17.5 degrees) outside the plasmasphere with a smaller amplitude about 81 pT. Detailed test particle simulations quantify the electron resonant scattering rates by the off-equatorial MS waves to find that they can cause the pitch angle scattering and momentum diffusion of radiation belt electrons with equatorial pitch angles < -75 degrees or < -58 degrees (depending on the wave latitudinal coverage) on timescales of a day. Subsequent two-dimensional Fokker-Planck diffusion simulations indicate that the strong off-equatorial MS waves are capable of efficiently transporting high pitch angle electrons to lower pitch angles to facilitate the formation of radiation belt electron butterfly distributions for a broad energy range from similar to 100keV to >1 MeV within an hour. Our study clearly demonstrates that the presence of off-equatorial MS waves, in addition to equatorial MS waves, can contribute importantly to the dynamical variations of radiation belt electron fluxes and their pitch angle distribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available