4.7 Article

Arctic Sea Ice Loss in Different Regions Leads to Contrasting Northern Hemisphere Impacts

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 945-954

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017GL076433

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cambridge Earth System Science NERC DTP (Natural Environment Research Council Doctoral Training Partnership)
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [bas0100032, bas0100033, 1654307] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [bas0100033, bas0100032] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To explore the mechanisms linking Arctic sea ice loss to changes in midlatitude surface temperatures, we conduct idealized modeling experiments using an intermediate general circulation model and with sea ice loss confined to the Atlantic or Pacific sectors of the Arctic (Barents-Kara or Chukchi-Bering Seas). Extending previous findings, there are opposite effects on the winter stratospheric polar vortex for both large-magnitude (late 21st century) and moderate-magnitude sea ice loss. Accordingly, there are opposite tropospheric Arctic Oscillation (AO) responses for moderate-magnitude sea ice loss. However, there are similar strength negative AO responses for large-magnitude sea ice loss, suggesting that tropospheric mechanisms become relatively more important than stratospheric mechanisms as the sea ice loss magnitude increases. The midlatitude surface temperature response for each loss region and magnitude can be understood as the combination of an indirect part induced by the large-scale circulation (AO) response, and a residual direct part that is local to the loss region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available