4.7 Article

North Atlantic temperature and pCO(2) coupling in the early-middle Miocene

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 519-522

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G40228.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation P2C2 program [OCE-1602557, OCE-1602905]
  2. YIBS Donnelley Post-doctoral Environmental Fellowship
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1602557] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate proxies indicate coupling between changes in atmospheric pCO(2), global temperatures, and ice volume over much of the Cenozoic. Evidence has been presented for decoupling of these factors in the Miocene, though the cause of the apparent decoupling was uncertain. Here, we revisit Deep Sea Drilling Program (DSDP) Site 608 (24-9 Ma) in the North Atlantic Ocean, to provide improved constraints on sea-surface temperatures (SSTs) using the TEX86 and U-37(k') proxies, and use these to recalculate atmospheric pCO(2) From the Oligocene/ Miocene boundary to the middle Miocene Climatic Optimum (MCO, ca. 23.03 to ca. 14.5 Ma), SSTs at Site 608 were upward of 30 C-degrees, nearly 15 C-degrees warmer than modern. During the Middle Miocene Climatic Transition (MMCT), ca. 14.5 to ca. 12.5 Ma), SSTs cooled by similar to 6 C-degrees. Lower SSTs persisted until the end of our record at 9 Ma. Our organic proxy derived SST estimates are considerably higher than those previously calculated from planktonic foraminiferal oxygen isotope data, leading to reassessed alkenone p CO2 estimates similar to 65 to similar to 175 ppm higher than previously calculated, with other assumptions held constant. A pCO(2) decrease from an average of similar to 430 ppm in MCO to similar to 305 ppm after the MMCT, in step with the similar to 6 C-degrees SST cooling, demonstrates coupling of climate and the carbon cycle, as well as a highly sensitive climate system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available