4.7 Article

Glyphosate sorption to soils of Argentina. Estimation of affinity coefficient by pedotransfer function

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 322, Issue -, Pages 140-148

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.02.037

Keywords

Glyphosate; Soil; Sorption coefficient; Multiple linear regression; Pedotransfer function

Categories

Funding

  1. INTA [PNSuelo 1134044]
  2. FONCyT [PICT 2013-837]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Argentine agricultural production is fundamentally based on a technological package that combines direct seeding and glyphosate with transgenic crops (soybean, maize and cotton), which makes glyphosate the most widely employed herbicide in the country. Glyphosate is strongly sorbed to soil in a reversible process that regulates the half-life and mobility of the herbicide, with the resulting risk of contaminating surface and groundwater courses. However, this behavior may vary depending on the characteristics of the soil on which it is applied. Sorption coefficients are thus the most sensitive parameters in models used for environmental risk assessment. The aim of this work was to study the affinity of glyphosate to 12 different soils of Argentina and create a model to estimate the glyphosate Freundlich sorption coefficient (K-f) from easily measurable soil properties. Batch equilibration adsorption data are shown by Freundlich adsorption isotherms. Principal component analysis and multiple linear regressions were used to correlate the effects of soil properties on glyphosate adsorption coefficients. Results indicate that pH and clay contents were the major soil parameters governing glyphosate adsorption in soils. The Freundlich (K-f) pedotransfer function obtained by stepwise regression analysis has 97.9% of the variation in glyphosate sorption coefficients that could be attributed to the variation of the soil clay contents, pH, P-Bray and Al-in.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available