4.7 Article

Experimental investigation of Fe3+-rich majoritic garnet and its effect on majorite geobarometer

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 225, Issue -, Pages 1-16

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2018.01.008

Keywords

Majorite barometer; High-pressure experiment; Flank Method; Fe3+ substitution

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR - 1447311]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41520104004, 41502038]
  3. Division Of Earth Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1447311] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Majoritic garnet [(Ca, Mg, Fe2+)(3)(Fe3+, Al, Si)(2)(SiO4)(3)] is one of the predominant and important constituents of upper mantle peridotite and ultra-deep subducted slabs. Majoritic substitution in garnet depends on pressure, and it has been used to estimate the formation pressure of natural majoritic garnet. Ferric iron (Fe3+) substitution occurs in natural majoritic garnets from mantle diamonds and shocked meteorites. However, available majorite geobarometers were developed without considering the effect of Fe3+ substitution in the structure. In this study, we systematically synthesized Fe3+-bearing majoritic garnets from 6.5 GPa to 15 GPa to evaluate the effect of Fe3+ on the majorite geobarometer. The Fe3+ contents of synthetic majoritic garnets were analyzed using the Flank method with the electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA). The results were compared with those based on the charge balance calculations. From the known synthesis pressures and measured Fe3+ contents, we developed a new majorite geobarometer for Fe3+-bearing majoritic garnets. Our results show that the existing majorite geobarometer, which does not take into account the Fe3+ substitution, could underestimate the formation pressure of majoritic garnets, especially for samples with a high majoritic component. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available