4.7 Article

SvABA: genome-wide detection of structural variants and indels by local assembly

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 581-591

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.221028.117

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [T32 HG002295/HG/NHGRI, U54CA143798, R01CA188228]
  2. DFCI-Novartis Drug Discovery Program
  3. Voices Against Brain Cancer
  4. Pediatric Low-Grade Astrocytoma Foundation
  5. Broad Institute
  6. Cure Starts Now Foundation
  7. Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award for Medical Scientists

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Structural variants (SVs), including small insertion and deletion variants (indels), are challenging to detect through standard alignment-based variant calling methods. Sequence assembly offers a powerful approach to identifying SVs, but is difficult to apply at scale genome-wide for SV detection due to its computational complexity and the difficulty of extracting SVs from assembly contigs. We describe SvABA, an efficient and accurate method for detecting SVs from short-read sequencing data using genome-wide local assembly with low memory and computing requirements. We evaluated SvABA's performance on the NA12878 human genome and in simulated and real cancer genomes. SvABA demonstrates superior sensitivity and specificity across a large spectrum of SVs and substantially improves detection performance for variants in the 20-300 bp range, compared with existing methods. SvABA also identifies complex somatic rearrangements with chains of short (<1000 bp) templated-sequence insertions copied from distant genomic regions. We applied SvABA to 344 cancer genomes from 11 cancer types and found that short templated-sequence insertions occur in similar to 4% of all somatic rearrangements. Finally, we demonstrate that SvABA can identify sites of viral integration and cancer driver alterations containing medium-sized (50-300 bp) SVs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available