4.5 Article

Fitness Tradeoffs of Antibiotic Resistance in Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli

Journal

GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 667-679

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evy030

Keywords

antibiotic resistance; trade-off; whole-genome sequencing; compensatory evolution; epistasis

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) [435248]
  2. Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) [MSH 141995]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evolutionary trade-offs occur when selection on one trait has detrimental effects on other traits. In pathogenic microbes, it has been hypothesized that antibiotic resistance trades off with fitness in the absence of antibiotic. Although studies of single resistance mutations support this hypothesis, it is unclear whether trade-offs are maintained over time, due to compensatory evolution and broader effects of genetic background. Here, we leverage natural variation in 39 extraintestinal clinical isolates of Escherichia coli to assess trade-offs between growth rates and resistance to fluoroquinolone and cephalosporin antibiotics. Whole-genome sequencing identifies a broad range of clinically relevant resistance determinants in these strains. We find evidence for a negative correlation between growth rate and antibiotic resistance, consistent with a persistent trade-off between resistance and growth. However, this relationship is sometimes weak and depends on the environment in which growth rates are measured. Using in vitro selection experiments, we find that compensatory evolution in one environment does not guarantee compensation in other environments. Thus, even in the face of compensatory evolution and other genetic background effects, resistance may be broadly costly, supporting the use of drug restriction protocols to limit the spread of resistance. Furthermore, our study demonstrates the power of using natural variation to study evolutionary trade-offs in microbes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available