4.7 Article

Clock-dependent chromatin topology modulates circadian transcription and behavior

Journal

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 32, Issue 5-6, Pages 347-358

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.312397.118

Keywords

circadian rhythms; chromatin topology; promoter-enhancer loops; DNA regulatory elements; transcriptional bursting

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A-153340]
  2. European Research Council [ERC-2010-StG-260667]
  3. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Post-graduate Studies Doctoral scholarship
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_153340] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The circadian clock in animals orchestrates widespread oscillatory gene expression programs, which underlie 24-h rhythms in behavior and physiology. Several studies have shown the possible roles of transcription factors and chromatin marks in controlling cyclic gene expression. However, how daily active enhancers modulate rhythmic gene transcription in mammalian tissues is not known. Using circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) combined with sequencing (4C-seq), we discovered oscillatory promoter-enhancer interactions along the 24-h cycle in the mouse liver and kidney. Rhythms in chromatin interactions were abolished in arrhythmic Bmal1 knockout mice. Deleting a contacted intronic enhancer element in the Cryptochrome 1 (Cry1) gene was sufficient to compromise the rhythmic chromatin contacts in tissues. Moreover, the deletion reduced the daily dynamics of Cry1 transcriptional burst frequency and, remarkably, shortened the circadian period of locomotor activity rhythms. Our results establish oscillating and clock-controlled promoter-enhancer looping as a regulatory layer underlying circadian transcription and behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available