4.7 Review

Assessing sufficiency and necessity of enhancer activities for gene expression and the mechanisms of transcription activation

Journal

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 32, Issue 3-4, Pages 202-223

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.310367.117

Keywords

enhancers; reporter assays; transcription regulation; enhancer prediction; gene expression; genetic screens

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P29613-B28, F4303-B09]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [647320]
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH
  4. Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enhancers are important genomic regulatory elements directing cell type-specific transcription. They assume a key role during development and disease, and their identification and functional characterization have long been the focus of scientific interest. The advent of next-generation sequencing and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/Cas9-based genome editing has revolutionized the means by which we study enhancer biology. In this review, we cover recent developments in the prediction of enhancers based on chromatin characteristics and their identification by functional reporter assays and endogenous DNA perturbations. We discuss that the two latter approaches provide different and complementary insights, especially in assessing enhancer sufficiency and necessity for transcription activation. Furthermore, we discuss recent insights into mechanistic aspects of enhancer function, including findings about cofactor requirements and the role of post-translational histone modifications such as monomethylation of histone H3 Lys4 (H3K4me1). Finally, we survey how these approaches advance our understanding of transcription regulation with respect to promoter specificity and transcriptional bursting and provide an outlook covering open questions and promising developments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available