4.2 Article

Tales of testosterone: Advancing our understanding of environmental endocrinology through studies of neotropical birds

Journal

GENERAL AND COMPARATIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 273, Issue -, Pages 184-191

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2018.07.003

Keywords

Testosterone; Androgens; Birds; Reproduction

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [IOS-0545735, IOS-1353093]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies of birds have greatly advanced our understanding of how testosterone modulates complex phenotypes, specifically its role in mediating male reproductive and associated behaviors. Yet most of the foundational studies have been limited to northern latitude breeding species despite the fact that they represent only a small fraction of worldwide avian diversity. In contrast, phylogenetic, life-history, and mating system diversity all reach their apex in neotropical avifauna and yet these birds, along with more southern latitude species, remain very poorly understood from an endocrine perspective. Despite the relatively limited previous work on taxa breeding in Central and South America, empirical findings have had a disproportionately large impact on our understanding of testosterone's role in everything from geographic variation to behavioral roles and neuroplasticity. Here, we synthesize how studies of neotropical breeding avifauna have advanced our understanding of how testosterone's actions can and are associated with the broad patterns of phenotypic diversity that we see in birds. In addition, we outline how these studies can be used individually or in a comparative context to address fundamental questions about the environmental endocrinology of testosterone and to understand the diversity of roles that testosterone plays in mediating behavioral variation, reproductive strategies, and associated life-history trade-offs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available